Square Kady Pascual Headshot RGZ5762

Kady Pascual

Hawaiʻi Scene on Social

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"}],"text":"Samantha! Let’s go get tattoos!"}]

Check out our new feature: Aloha State Daily wants to see your Hawai‘i sky pictures! Click 

For the latest news of Hawai‘i, sign up 

IslandMagicMike

<title>Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Dreams do come true</title>

Today’s social media find comes from @IslandMagicMike, who has a hidden talent.

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Dreams do come true

Samantha! Let’s go get tattoos!  Make sure you follow @IslandMagicMike on Instagram! Check out our new feature: Aloha State Daily wants to see your Hawai‘i sky pictures! Click here to learn more and submit. For the latest news of Hawai‘i, sign up here for our free Daily Edition newsletter!

Stephanie Salmons Headshot

Stephanie Salmons

Business & Tourism

The people have spoken, casting their votes for the best hotels and resorts across the Islands in Condé Nast Traveler's 2025 Readers' Choice Awards.

The Ritz-Carlton Residences, Waikīkī Beach

. It previously was ranked No. 1 in 2023, as well.

 earlier this year, which is part of a multi-phase, multi-year renovation.

Mike Kass, general manager of The Ritz-Carlton Residences, Waikiki Beach, said in a statement that the honor is a testament to the "passion, dedication and excellence" of the hotel's more than 250 staff members "

who bring the spirit of The Ritz-Carlton to life each and every day

Rounding out the top 10 Hawai‘i hotels are 

The Laylow Waikīkī, Autograph Collection

, located on the Big Island's Kohala Coast, ranks No. 1 on the list of 

Mauna Kea Beach Hotel, Autograph Collection

Hundreds of thousands of people submitted their ratings between April 1 and June 30, and the results were tabulated by Condé Nast. Read more about the methodology 

A number of Hawai‘i hotels were also recently ranked among the best in the U.S. in the USA Today 10Best Readers' Choice Awards. Read more about those 

For the latest news of Hawai‘i, sign up 

HNLRR Exterior HERO 2022

<title>Hawai‘i hotels, resorts recognized in Condé Nast Traveler's 2025 Readers' Choice Awards</title>

Hundreds of thousands of people voted between April 1 and June 30 to find the best hotels, resorts, cruise lines, spas, cities and more around the world, including the top hotels and resorts in Hawai‘i.

Hawai‘i hotels, resorts recognized in Condé Nast Traveler's 2025 Readers' Choice Awards

Square Mike Brestovansky Headshot RGZ3736 Large

Michael Brestovansky

Government & Politics

Crime & Courts

The Hawai‘i Supreme Court will hear a case that could leave online travel agency Booking.com owing the state nearly $20 million in taxes.

In 2021, the Hawai‘i Department of Taxation informed the Netherlands-based Booking.com B.V. that the company owed $19.7 million in General Excise Taxes between 2010 and 2020 after a change to the department’s administrative rules.

According to previous rules, the services provided by “commissioned agents” — which includes online booking agencies like Booking.com — were considered to be consumed at the agent’s offices. In the case of Booking.com, that location was Amsterdam, meaning its services were subject to Dutch, not Hawaiian, tax laws.

The updated rule change provided an exception to that rule whereby online booking agents’ services are now considered to be consumed at the address being booked. This change left Booking.com owing millions in unpaid GET revenues. According to a DOTAX court filing, the agency had not paid any GET since 2010.

Since then, a court battle has blossomed over the delinquent taxes, with the Hawai‘i Supreme Court accepting the case last week.

Booking.com has argued in a lawsuit against DOTAX and its director, Gary Suganuma, that the tax is discriminatory, violating the Internet Tax Freedom Act, a federal law established in 1998 prohibiting state and local governments from imposing taxes on the internet or online activity.

However, that is not what the Supreme Court case is about. As is the case with many Supreme Court cases, the Booking.com suit is less about the material concerns that triggered the initial complaint — e.g., the millions of dollars owed in back taxes — than it is about an esoteric conflict between two state laws that dictate whether the state’s district courts can adjudicate tax-related cases.

When Booking.com filed its initial complaint against DOTAX in 2019 — before any tax assessment was formally presented, but after the rule change was implemented — DOTAX quickly moved to have it dismissed, arguing that state laws prohibit district courts from ruling “in any controversy with respect to taxes.”

On the other hand, Booking.com argued that its complaint was not a “controversy” involving taxes, but was instead about the validity of a state agency rule, which district courts can adjudicate.

First Circuit Court Judge James Ashford initially disagreed with DOTAX, but after DOTAX requested the court reconsider, a different judge, Gary Chang, came to the opposite verdict. Chang dismissed Booking.com’s complaint, leading the agency to bring the case to the state Intermediate Court of Appeals.

The ICA ruled in 2023 in favor of DOTAX, finding the arguments by Booking.com disingenuous, so the website once again appealed to a higher court.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear oral arguments on the case, which are scheduled to take place Nov. 4. Once that case is resolved, the greater question about the $19 million in GET will be discussed at the state Tax Appeal Court, where the case has stalled for four years.

I Stock 178835830 16x9 Large

<title>Online travel agency could owe state $20 million in GET</title>

Lawsuit by Booking.com against the Hawai‘i Department of Taxation going to state Supreme Court.

Online travel agency could owe state $20 million in GET

IMG 1445

Rick Hamada

Sports

Columnists

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"}],"text":"I'd like to talk with you about golf."}]

When one mentions the game of golf, what comes to mind?

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"}],"text":"Well, it's a few things:"}]

While reactions range from positive to not-so-positive, golf is the most popular participation sport in Hawai‘i.

There are nearly 100,000 "local" golfers playing on 75 public and private courses, according to the 

I suggest that other individual "ball" sports, such as tennis and pickleball, would fall short of these numbers.

The Hawai‘i golf industry has a direct/indirect economic impact of $3.4 billion on the state's economy, per the 

Hawai‘i Golf Industry – 2023 Economic Report Summary

A celebrated sub-section of Oahu golf is the Honolulu Municipal Golf Courses.

The six muni courses include Ala Wai, Ted Makalena, ‘Ewa Villages, The Pali, West Loch, and Kahuku.

The attractions include the cost value, online tee times, promotion of walking the courses, and accessibility to the entire island.

Golf is a game that teaches life lessons.

Junior golf programs are excellent in introducing the game to our local youth.

The teachings of discipline, commitment, goal setting, and respect are invaluable and are at the center of perpetuating the game for generations.

It's the only sport that relies on self-policing.

You call rule violations on yourself, you enter your own score, and you play the game without referees and judges.

Those who subscribe to these principles respect the game and remain stewards for others to follow.

The concept of sportsmanship has long been associated with golf.

You can learn a great deal about a person by playing a round of golf together, based on how they play the game and how they treat others on the course.

However, there are some players who show no respect, integrity, or sportsmanship at all. You may even find them in your own groups.

But sportsmanship is not only on the course but with those who are fans.

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"},{"type":"bold"}],"text":"Ryder Cup 2025"}]

The recently completed Ryder Cup 2025 will go down in history as the 

and vitriolic event in golf's storied history. 

In 1927, British businessman Samuel Ryder established a British vs. American golf competition.

For years, and indeed, decades, America dominated.

To increase competition, the field expanded from simply the British to all of Europe.

It worked, and the biennial, three-day event has become one of the most watched and celebrated competitions worldwide.

And that is why what transpired at Bethpage Black, New York, will forever be a stain.

At the core, players are playing for pride and country.

But this time, the American team was promised more than honor and bragging rights. Only they were promised money.

A protest by one American player then led other players to demand compensation.

Should they have demanded monetary compensation for playing the Ryder Cup? No.

Qualifying to be on a Ryder Cup team is the literal dream of an American golfer. To play for your country on the world stage exceeds 

Two U.S. players refused the personal payment, but 10 more appeared to have accepted it.

However, it was not just the American players putting on a show.

In fact, it was the American spectators who truly betrayed the Ryder Cup by acting like buffoons.

During what was supposed to be an honorable and civil game of golf, the spectators hurled profane and personal insults at the European players. The unfair impeding of play and abysmal conduct was utterly disgusting and unilaterally unacceptable.

This boorish behavior escalated when, after the Europeans won the cup, a twisted idiot tried to hit European player Rory McIlroy as he was leaving the course with his wife.

Instead, whatever the spectator threw struck his wife.

Ironically, Erica, McIlroy's wife, is American, as is their young daughter. McIlroy has repeatedly sung his praises for America, which he calls home.

Is this how he and his family deserve to be treated?

U.S. Ryder Cup Captain Keegan Bradley never issued an apology for the abhorrent way our people acted.

It took PGA Hall of Fame member and former Ryder Cup Captain Tom Watson to step up when Bradley did not.

The scurrilous conduct of so many angered the legendary Tiger Woods, while others in the game denounced the play of the drunken and unruly "fans".

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"}],"text":"How do you fix this?"}]

You can never put the toothpaste back in the tube again.

However, the brutish atmosphere at Bethpage Black can never be allowed again. Clearly stated rules of conduct, with violations resulting in immediate discharge from the next Ryder Cup tournament grounds in four years, would be a start.

Ryder Cup Getty Images 2237626491

<title>Hamada: Golf gets a black eye</title>

Nearly 100,000 Hawai‘i golfers take to local courses every year, so a lot of kama‘āina likely saw what went down at the Ryder Cup. Not much aloha spirit on display in Farmingdale.

Hamada: Golf gets a black eye

Cheryl Tsutsumi

Cheryl Chee Tsutsumi

Aloha Spirit

Twice a week, when Robert Castro heads to Waipahu to volunteer at Hawai‘i’s Plantation Village (HPV), he feels like he’s going home. That’s not far — literally — from the truth. From 1948 to 1961, he grew up across the street from the outdoor museum, which spotlights the people who came from faraway lands to work on Island sugar plantations.

Castro’s paternal grandfather emigrated to Hawai‘i from Madeira in 1879 when he was six months old. His maternal grandfather came from San Miguel island in the Azores in the 1880s when he was about five. As young men, they began working on plantations, his maternal grandfather initially at Kīlauea Sugar Company on Kaua‘i and his paternal grandfather at Kahuku Sugar Plantation and/or Waialua Agricultural Company on O‘ahu’s north shore. Both wound up on the payroll of O‘ahu Sugar Company (OSC) in Waipahu, as did Castro’s father.

“Dad started as a fireman in 1924, at age 17,” Castro said. “The firemen were the guys who shoveled coal into the firebox of trains to burn and create steam power. Later, he became a locomotive engineer, driving the trains that hauled cane from the fields to the mill.”

In the early 1950s, trucks began replacing OSC’s aged trains because they were more efficient, reliable and cost-effective. For one thing, they weren’t limited to a fixed network of tracks; they could go anywhere there was asphalt. Moreover, it was easier and cheaper to modify trucking routes than to build new rail lines, which came with high construction and maintenance costs.

“When the plantation stopped using trains, Dad became a water luna [supervisor],” Castro said. “He managed ‘gangs’ or crews that kept the irrigation ditches clear of weeds and debris.”

At the time, Castro, his sister, parents and maternal grandparents were living in a three-bedroom cottage on the plantation. Monkeypod trees towered over a row of those modest houses, all of which were torn down in the mid-1980s to make way for light industrial businesses.

The monkeypods, however, still stand. “The tree in front of our house was so big, its branches extended over our porch,” Castro said. “Every time I drive past that tree, it reminds me of small kid time on the plantation.”

He spent many happy hours playing marbles, riding bikes and gabbing with his cousins as they cooled their feet in the irrigation ditches. Meals were usually quick and easy since Castro’s mom worked full time as a janitor at Waipahu Elementary School. For dinner, there would be dishes such as chop suey, tuna patties and corned beef stew, always with rice. His family bought a TV in 1954, which introduced a whole new world of entertainment. “Wagon Train” and “The Lone Ranger” were among Castro’s favorite shows.

In 1961, the year he graduated from Waipahu High School, Castro and his family moved off the plantation into a larger house in Pearl City, where he now lives. Six years later, his father retired from OSC, which had supported him and his ‘ohana for 43 years.

Meanwhile, Castro was forging his own career path. At 18, he enlisted in the Navy, which took him to Australia, Guam, Japan, Vietnam, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Antarctica and the Philippines. He also completed two tours of duty in Hawai‘i before retiring with 29 years of service.

Settled back on O‘ahu, Castro worked as a member of the American Lung Association’s administrative support staff for two years before deciding he wanted to earn a college degree. He graduated from the University of Hawai‘i-West O‘ahu with a bachelor’s degree in history in 1999.

“Instead of writing a research paper for my final project, I chose to do a practicum, which required me to volunteer at a historic site,” Castro said. “I had taken a class on sugar plantation life, and it got me thinking about my family. I thought Hawai‘i’s Plantation Village would be perfect for my practicum.”

Castro started volunteering at HPV in the fall of 1998 and never stopped. Although he resigned as a docent last fall and as a board member in March (serving 26 and 23 years, respectively), he’s still at HPV on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, doing various other tasks. They include watering the yards; helping to plan special events; and chatting with visitors in the exhibit room, which chronicles Hawai‘i’s sugar plantation era, mid-1800s to mid-1900s, through maps, photos and displays.  

Opened in 1992, HPV features a village of 25 buildings representing the major immigrant groups—Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, Okinawan, Portuguese and Puerto Rican. Only the Japanese Inari (Shinto) shrine and the foundation of the Chinese cookhouse are original. The rest of the structures—including a store, infirmary, barbershop and cottages—are replicas, faithfully built according to measurements of actual plantation buildings on O‘ahu, Maui, Kaua‘i and Hawai‘i island.

The Filipino house represents the year 1935, the “modern era”; thus, it’s the only building in the village that’s equipped with electricity and a telephone. “The other houses reflect an earlier period,” Castro said. “Filipinos started arriving in Hawai‘i in 1906; they were the last immigrant group to come. When O‘ahu Sugar Company closed in 1995, two years shy of its 100

 anniversary, its workers were primarily Filipino. Waipahu is still predominantly a Filipino community.”

The artifacts in the cottages were donated by plantation families. They run the gamut, from cookware, furniture and religious items to stoves, musical instruments and ceramic crockery.

“My tours always stopped at the forno [brick oven] in back of the Portuguese house,” Castro said. “That’s where I told visitors about the forno at my family’s plantation home. Today you can buy sweet bread any time, but when I was a boy, the only time we had sweet bread was when Grandma baked it in our forno for Christmas. We ate it with my mother’s vinha d’alhos [pickled pork], usually after midnight mass.”

Castro enjoys sharing personal anecdotes and little-known tidbits gleaned from years of research. “It’s important to keep our plantation history alive; it’s the reason why Hawai‘i is a vibrant melting pot today,” he said. “Many kamaʻāina are here because of the courage and dreams of their immigrant ancestors.”

) is open daily except Sunday. Reservations for guided 90-minute tours should be made in advance by calling (808) 677-0110 or emailing 

HPV hosts three annual events: a New Year’s celebration in February, an Obon celebration in June and a Harvest Moon Festival in September. In addition, it is the location for special events organized by other entities throughout the year. Among them is 

DSC 8657 Large

<title>Uncles and Aunties: Robert Castro keeps plantation history alive</title>

Through his years of volunteer work at Hawai‘i’s Plantation Village in Waipahu, Castro pays his respects to Hawai‘i's history and to that of his own family.

Uncles and Aunties: Robert Castro keeps plantation history alive

Arrasmith Portrait

Perry Arrasmith

The most bizarre section in Hawai‘i’s 

 is the one that relates to the state’s regulation of population growth. It is a testament to a bygone era informed by misguided local anxieties. 

Runaway population growth across the Hawaiian Islands once occupied the Hawai'i zeitgeist. While much of this mindset persists in the halls of society, it contrasts with Hawai‘i’s contemporary demographic woes. 

Between April 1960 and April 1970, Hawai‘i added 115,510 residents to its population, totalling 748,182 residents across the islands. It was a meteoric rise that stressed the Hawai‘i’s poor infrastructure, corrupt land management practices, and limited housing across the islands. 

Hawai‘i was a young, growing society. The median age of a resident was 25. Much of the State’s dynamism and vigour, in turn, were informed by a mix of talent both local and non-local.

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"}],"text":"Perhaps it was too much of a good thing. "}]

During this time, national commentators were fretting about the global population’s growth. Paul and Anne Ehrlich had co-authored 

in 1968. Internationally, the Club of Rome furnished the

report, which only further argued against overconsumption. Political views wrapped in scientific dogma started-off a new movement whose cultural salience was confirmed by the 1973 film 

While societies were wasteful and inefficient, these reports didn’t necessarily call for more efficiency. Instead, they called for fewer people. 

While the times have changed, our Constitution’s outdated language shows how we are still stuck in the ’70s. Through national debates over population control, Hawai‘i became a tragic guinea pig that used environmentalism to justify population control, opening the floodgates for arguments against urban development, immigration, and economic growth. 

These conversations continue to plague Hawai‘i’s zeitgeist, most notably when it comes to unnecessary conflict between economic growth and environmental stewardship.

In 1970, the Hawai‘i State Legislature passed Senate Resolution 305, establishing the State’s Temporary Commission on Population Stabilization. A 1972 report issued by the Commission suggested an inverse relationship between environmental stewardship and population growth. 

“It remains to be seen whether or not we will achieve a balance with the limits of the Hawaiian environment in this present period of growth in Hawaiian history,” the 

 warned, “but it should be recognized that with respect to maintaining the quality of the environment, population and prosperity are ‘trade-offs.’ If we expect to maintain a fixed level of pollution and impact on the environment by people in Hawaii, then any increase in one will require a corresponding decrease in the other.”

In the following year, the State Senate once again adopted a resolution calling for the establishment of an optimum state population. “The question of population equilibria among the Islands is a difficult one to answer quantitatively,” a 

 from the Department of Planning and Economic Development warned.

“One must consider the impact on the environment, what ‘quality of life’ should be used as a measure, means of developing a viable economy within a stable population, and the size of population on each Island which will bring about a desirable balance with the social and natural environment of Hawai‘i.”

Nationally, the Commission on Population and the American Future had been established by federal law in March 1970. A final 

 issued by the Commission was submitted to the U.S. Congress in March 1972, with proposals ranging from increased abortion access to voluntary sterilization to stricter immigration controls. Out of political embarrassment for its recommendations, the Nixon Administration largely distanced itself from the Commission.

However, the rhetoric which argued for limits on immigration had devastating consequences. In the present-day, arguments blaming immigrants for environmental degradation have had devastating 

Back in Hawai‘i, the reports stacked on one another. In 1972, Earl R. Babbie of the civic organization 

, a major argument for a cap on Hawai‘i’s population at one million (Hawai‘i’s population reached this threshold in the mid-’80s). 

These reports built a case for a more permanent state agency tasked with controlling the state’s population growth. As a result, the Commission on Population Stabilization and the Hawaiian Future was 

A primary architect of the measure, Nadao Yoshinga, was not solely worried about the influx of outsiders. Natural population growth among existing residents was another worry. Yoshinaga, an influential member of the State Senate, would 

 in the name of limited Hawai‘i’s population growth over the coming years. Limiting population by whatever means necessary (in the confines of the law) was the objective.

At around this time, Robert C. Schmitt, the State Statistician of Hawai‘i, 

 of the emerging field of population policy. Proponents of population control, at least in the early Statehood era, had started to organize in the late ’60s through such organizations as the University of Hawai‘i-sponsored Zero Population Growth-Honoulu, Citizens for Hawai‘i, Life of the Land, the Sierra Club, and Save our Surf. 

These groups advocated for policies to halt population migration, economic development, and other factors like densified communities in the name of environmentalism. Perhaps tragically, this misguided approach to Hawai‘i’s prevailing problems created a manichean world of values in conflict with one another.

Arguments for population control in the name of environmental stewardship had a real impact on policy in the late ’70s. Most notably, this came to a head in 1977.

During his annual State of the State address, Governor George Ariyoshi directly addressed population control, arguing for immigration controls and density regulation in the name of the ‘aloha spirit.’

“The problem of excessive population seems to be central to nearly every problem in the State.” he started. “Too many people means too few jobs and too much competition for them. Too many people means too little land for agriculture, parks, and scenic vistas. Too many people means too much crime and too much erosion of possibly our single most important commodity: the Aloha Spirit. Too many people means too much pressure on all our governmental and private institutions.” 

Ariyoshi wanted fewer people in Hawai‘i, plain and simple. To reinforce his views, the State Legislature even sponsored a 

 on population and the Hawaiian future in March 1977. 

One piece of legislation would have discriminated against recent arrivals to Hawai‘i through residency requirements for state jobs. A Federal Judge based in Honolulu, the part-Hawaiian Sam P. King, condemned the State of Hawai‘i’s flirtation with a flagrantly “anti-migratory” statute.

These attempts provide a marked contrast with the present day. In January 2025, the Department of Human Services 

 that the State suffers from a vacancy rate of 24% of all civil services positions (equivalent to more than 4,000 jobs). 

Nevertheless, Hawai‘i still inserted a section into its Constitution at the 1978 Constitutional Convention that called for population planning. To date, it is the only Constitution in the United States with such explicit language.

Instead of promoting smarter urban planning methods that conserved space while reducing sprawl or incentivizing farmers to bring more fallow agricultural land into cultivation, it was more convenient to blame the outside migrants for Hawai‘i’s development problems.

Instead of fostering solutions which invite greater societal innovation, it is more convenient to fall for an ideology wrapped in the veneer of science. 

Since 1970, Hawai‘i’s population fortunes have reversed.

Global population growth is not exponential, nor could it sustain the growth rates witnessed after the Second World War. In fact, our planet’s 

 will likely begin declining before 2100. 

The paranoia of the ’70s became irrelevant over the following decade. By 1983, the Commission on Population and the Hawaiian Future had been abolished.

For a majority of Hawai‘i’s residents in 2025, the ’70s are a foreign, unknown domain. Since Hawai‘i’s 

 was 41 as of 2024, it’s safe to conclude more than half of Hawai‘i’s population was born after 1980.

Today, Hawai‘i is missing people. It is one of the fastest aging states in the United States. The population is contracting, with more than half of all Native Hawaiians on the planet living outside of the archipelago.

Culturally, it is still easy to blame the outsider for our own problems. Instead of acknowledging our own complicitly in failing to plan for the future, it is far easier to find that the outsider is only exacerbating the problems we are not addressing. Policies which now arrest growth not only injure potential migrants. They also hurt residents.

The debates over population control in the ’70s were about a fear of change and a society’s failure to properly navigate the pressures wrought by new forces.

Contemporary conflicts over growth still magnify this attitude. Not unironically, stewarding Hawai‘i’s environment means Hawai‘i’s environment needs to also steward Hawai‘i’s people.

“It should be remembered,” Governor John Burns said in 

, “that the key ingredient in any environment is man himself: he is part and parcel of and the key to the value of our total system of symbiotic relationships on this earth. Being a part of the environment demands that we consider human economics together with biological ecology.” 

“If man is hungry, ill-housed, undereducated or poorly treated in his society,” he wondered, “what service is it to him that his environment remains in its pristine, natural state?”

A society without one cannot have the other. We need to think about growth, not stabilization. We need to think about people.

In our own time, we need a Constitution whose thinking is not tethered to the past. While the language in outdated documents like our Constitution locks our zeitgeist in another time, we need to get over our history. We need a better zeitgeist.

Crowd i Stock 1357524756

<title>Hawai‘i's bizarre legacy of population control (and why it's still here)</title>

In the 1970s, Hawai‘i gave in to fears of overpopulation, so much so that population control was put into the State Constitution.

Hawai‘i's bizarre legacy of population control (and why it's still here)

Hawai‘i lawmakers voted with their party on the federal budget bill that shut down the federal government.

Democrats in the U.S. Senate refused to budge on the 

Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act

, which would provide funding for various federal agencies. While seven Democrats were needed to split from their party to pass the bill, only two did so on Tuesday, neither of whom were Hawai‘i senators Brian Schatz or Mazie Hirono.

Without the votes to pass the bill — the vote was 55-45, but needed 60 votes in favor to pass — the federal government will shut down tonight at midnight, with thousands of federal workers to be furloughed or work without pay.

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Dreams do come true

Kady Pascual

Social Media Editor

More in Hawaiʻi Scene on Social

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Going big

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Take a trip

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Too busy vibing

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: It’s October 1st

Most read

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Dreams do come true

Authors

Kady Pascual

Social Media Editor

More in Hawaiʻi Scene on Social

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Going big

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Take a trip

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: Too busy vibing

Hawai‘i Scene on Social: It’s October 1st

Most read