Letter to the Editor: A statement of hubris, sure, but 'bombastic'?

A reader from Honolulu writes in to thank Aloha State Daily columnist Perry Arrasmith for his recent article but questions what was really going on during 1954 with both political parties.

LttE
Letters to the Editor

August 13, 20261 min read

Inouye, Matsunaga, Mink, Burns, Johnson
One result of the 1954 Democratic Revolution in Hawai‘i: This 1966 gathering of President Lyndon B. Johnson (center) posing with Hawai‘i Democrats after church (L-R) Congr. Spark Matsunaga, Congr. Patsy Mink, Pres. Johnson, Gov. John Burns, Sen. Daniel Inouye (Wikimedia Commons - LBJ Library)

Regarding: Perry Arrasmith's column, "What Hawai‘i’s 1954 Democratic Party platform says about today"

I appreciate Mr. Arrasmith's curiosity regarding the Democratic Party's domination of Hawaiʻi politics, his research, and article.

I found of interest his statement, "It’s a bombastic document that hails the Democratic Party as 'the greatest political party in the world today.'"

Why did the Democratic Party put that statement in the document since they could have used other words? What was happening in 1954 that gave them confidence to use those words? Mr. Arrasmith didn't put their statement in context of the time.

Could the statement have been accurate given the state of the Republican Party in 1954? The statement may be guilty of hubris, but was it bombastic?

We would definitely have more unity in our country if we kept party platforms simpler and more universal.

Mary Ellen Williams, Honolulu

For the latest news of Hawai‘i, sign up here for our free Daily Edition newsletter.

Authors

LttE

Letters to the Editor

Representative Only